Why Sir Martin Sorrell has issued another profit warning for S4 Capital. Tony Walford quoted in The Drum

Overexposure to the tech sector is the culprit behind the company’s second warning to investors in a year. The tech winter has continued to bite advertising groups well into the summer. S4 Capital has issued a profit warning to investors, citing “challenging macroeconomic conditions” and technology clients “remaining cautious and very focussed on the short term.”

S4, which is led by former WPP founder Sir Martin Sorrell, revised its prediction for annual organic revenue growth to 2%-4%, down from 6%-10%. The company’s statement suggested that job cuts could be on the way in the second half of the financial year, referring to “a disciplined approach to cost management, including headcount and discretionary costs.” S4 Capital currently employs 8,600 people worldwide. This is not the first profit warning Sorrell has been forced to issue. In 2022, despite bullish predictions, he was forced to row back on numbers as operating costs rose faster than revenue. That followed an auditing mix-up that delayed the release of financial results and sent its share price tumbling. Tony Walford, Partner of  Green Square, said of the latest update: “It’s never great when a company issues a profit warning and S4 is likely to get more scrutiny than most given its share price woes over the past 18 months.” S4’s share price was down by around 20% on the update. The group is more exposed than other holding companies to the broader tech sector, notes Walford. Its growth strategy has focused on capturing and keeping a small set of very large clients, dubbed ‘whoppers’ by Sorrell. That approach has meant that spending shifts at those companies have disproportionately impacted its revenues. “Agencies with significant tech clients are likely to see revenue challenges, given the continued layoffs in that sector, and S4, with ‘whoppers’ Adobe, Google, Meta and Amazon, will certainly be feeling the pinch,” continues Walford. Revenues at S4 came in underweight during May and June, resulting in the company’s operating margins being thinned. In particular, S4’s latest statement highlighted a slowdown in activity within its core advertising and content business and client hesitancy around big-ticket ‘transformation’ projects, which previously propelled the company’s growth. “We continue to see longer sales cycles, particularly for larger transformation projects. Some impact has been seen in each of the practices, but it is particularly evident in content,” the statement said. According to Walford: “The longer sales cycles for large transformation projects are not a surprise, as big corporations focus on short-term revenue and shifting products in an economic slowdown, but what did stand out is the reduction in spend on content. I would have expected this to be more resilient as it’s a key component of consumer influence. It will be interesting to see if this is a trend across the agency landscape.” The profit warning makes S4 the second advertising group to reduce revenue growth expectations this year. Last week Interpublic Group said it expected organic growth of 1-2%, down from 2-4%. IPG, which owns agencies R/GA, Huge and Mediabrands, also credited that reduction to lower spending among tech clients.

Read more

Does the Uncommon-Havas deal make financial sense? Barry Dudley writes in The Drum

Uncommon’s sale of a majority stake to Havas is a great result for its founders, but might not be quite what it seems, writes Green Square’s Barry Dudley. There’s been plenty written about how Uncommon will ‘bring new energy’ to Havas and the work that made its creative reputation but what of the deal itself, the structure, the heady numbers? That’s where I come in. As is usually the case there is very little disclosed, which means the information void gets filled with assumptions and guesses. Completely understandable. But I thought I’d use some EI to delve into things – that’s right, EI not AI: experience intelligence. Let’s start with the official Havas release: “The Uncommon founders will retain a material stake in the business (49%), maintaining their entrepreneurial zest, growing their brand globally and sharing best practice across Havas and parent company Vivendi, a world leader in media, entertainment, and communication.” This landmark deal reflects the entrepreneurial approach of Havas and bucks the industry standard deals – valuing the future potential of Uncommon at £80-£120m considering their projected growth plans. Uncommon will retain its brand, vision and freedom to make its own decisions across its client partners, internal team and creative output in this exciting next stage of growth for the studio.” What does my EI make of ‘entrepreneurial approach’? Havas has bought 51%. As this is a majority it means that it can bring 100% of Uncommon’s results into its group numbers. Pretty smart. But why is it entrepreneurial? I think there are a number of factors: The management team still holds equity, it remains owners of a substantial part of the business. They will feel that it still belongs to them. The mindset and outlook of an owner is very different to that of an employee. This ownership maintains their status as entrepreneurs, they haven’t sold out. But they are entrepreneurs that have also reset their personal lives by realizing a healthy lump of value. Surely they will relax a little now? For Uncommon I think it will be quite the opposite. Their appetite for being entrepreneurial, for taking risks, will be higher – they are no longer betting the farm as they were when everything sat on their shoulders. And there’s still 49% to be realized at some stage. The phrases “valuing the future potential” and ‘considering [Uncommon’s] projected growth plans’ were the next things to get the EI twitching. For those of you easily shocked or disheartened, you should stop reading now. Uncommon’s founders have not sold their business for ‘£80m-£120m’. So where do these fabulous numbers come from? The ‘future’ is six years from now, which I assume is a time when Havas has agreed that management could sell more of their equity. If over those six years, Uncommon has delivered ‘their projected growth plans’ the business will undoubtedly be significantly bigger than it is right now. Apply an agreed valuation multiple to that business and you get to £80m-£120m. That’s a value six years from now, assuming significant growth and it’s for 100% of the business (51% of which has already been sold). It sounds like my EI is trying to make out that this isn’t a great deal. That’s not the case. To save you doing the maths, at the upper end, selling the remaining 49% at a valuation of £120m would give them £58.8m! And I would not be surprised if the Uncommon team smash their own growth plans and the numbers get even bigger. But this maths is still quite hard to comprehend, so I thought I’d make the EI work a little harder. Uncommon’s last filed financial statements were for the year ending 31 December 2021. It had a turnover of £26.8m, gross profit (or net revenue) of £11.6m which was 50% up on the prior year, and an operating profit of £1.6m. If you add back depreciation to the operating profit you get to an EBITDA that is probably around £1.8m – that’s a margin on gross profit of 15.5%. And the average monthly number of employees for 2021 was 63. According to LinkedIn Uncommon now has 168 ‘employees’. This will include contractors and freelancers, so I’m going to take an EI guess that Uncommon’s average monthly number of employees for 2022 was 95 – ie, it grew by 50% again. Maintaining this level of growth is going to be very hard to sustain even if it conquers the US as I believe it hopes to. If, say, the business then grows at 20% a year from 2022, the gross profit in 2028 would be £52m. At 30% a year, it would be a “mere” £84m. And let’s assume the EBITDA margin improves over that time from 15.5% to 17.5% as the Havas corporate expertise is leveraged. That would give a range of £9.1m to £14.7m for EBITDA in 2028. Apply an eight to 10 multiple… Lots of assumptions on assumptions, but that’s what growth plans have to be built on. Only time will tell if this rather distracting future valuation becomes a reality. Fingers crossed for Uncommon and Havas. Read more

Majority stake in London indie Uncommon will ‘bring new energy’ to Havas. Barry Dudley quoted in The Drum

The French holding company has acquired a controlling stake in one of the most successful indie shops in Britain. Havas has acquired a majority stake in creative Uncommon in a deal which values the vaunted London indie at £120m. The deal, Havas boss Yannick Bolloré said, would “bring new energy” into the Havas network and bolster its creative edge at a time when many clients are being lured away from traditional suppliers by in-housing or the promise of generative AI. “Uncommon have created a new space and energy in the industry. They are a once-in-a-decade company and having them join the Havas family is an exciting prospect. We share a vision: with every project, Uncommon and Havas remind the world that creativity is, and always has been, the difference,” he said. According to Barry Dudley, partner at M&A consultancy Green Square, the deal could go some way to rounding out Havas’ client offer to the broader market. “That’s quite a coup for Havas to snap up one of the brightest stars on the UK creative scene in recent years. And super smart for the Uncommon team – landing in a group known more for its media than its creative capabilities; that has arguably needed a statement creative asset in the family; that has the footprint to rapidly accelerate Uncommon’s growth; and gives them access to the broader Vivendi group,“ he says. “The deal value will undoubtedly have been at the premium end of the spectrum and I’m fascinated by some of the words in the Havas release: ‘entrepreneurial approach’, ‘bucks the industry standard deals’, ‘valuing the future potential’. There’s quite a bit to delve into there.“ Uncommon’s founders, Lucy Jameson, Natalie Graeme and Nils Leonard, retain a 49% stake in the agency, and will continue to run the business at arm’s length from the wider Havas group. Graeme said the deal would allow the business to open an office in New York and expand rapidly. “Havas, along with its sister companies in Vivendi, offers Uncommon a way to accelerate into the spaces where we have already made headway,” she said. Read more