Havas and Horizon’s global gambit: a strategic masterstroke or market mirage? Barry Dudley writes in The Drum

Barry Dudley examines whether the launch of Horizon Global – a joint venture between Havas and Horizon Media Holdings, bringing together $20bn in combined billings and billed as the first AI-era agency network – is a genuine game-changer for media agencies or just glossy boardroom spin. Horizon Global is to be a new entity focused specifically on “US-centric global client opportunities,” allowing both parent entities to maintain their independence. The profits are split, leadership is shared between New York and Paris, and there is to be a combined tech offer that merges Horizon’s Blu platform with Havas’s Converged.AI to create BluConverged. The timing isn’t coincidental. With Omnicom’s pending acquisition of IPG creating a behemoth with billings reportedly north of $70bn, rumors swirling around Dentsu’s potential sale of its international operations, and WPP with a new CEO, the big holdco landscape is experiencing unprecedented change. Horizon Global is hoping to emerge as an alternative for global marketers who suddenly find their agency options dramatically reduced. Bob Lord, Horizon’s president who now also serves as interim CEO of the joint venture, puts it simply: “There is a lack of client choice out in the marketplace.”

Why this could be genius

The strategic logic behind Horizon Global is compelling on multiple fronts. First, it addresses a fundamental geographic imbalance that has long plagued both agencies. Horizon brings formidable US muscle to Havas, while Havas contributes strong European presence, particularly in France and Spain, to Horizon. Then there is speed to market. Interested clients can pick up the phone and enquire – it exists now. Unlike a full merger, which inevitably involves integration headaches and cultural clashes, Horizon Global will become its own thing while allowing the parent businesses to maintain their existing operations just the way they are. It’s collaboration without the pain of full integration. By contrast, the Omnicom-IPG deal was announced last December and only received FTC approval a few days ago, and even then, it was subject to conditions around commitment to political neutrality. If they get it right, the BluConverged platform will combine years of R&D investment by Havas and Horizon with access to a significantly bigger and deeper data pool. Perhaps most importantly, the timing of all of this capitalizes on market uncertainty. If you were a client who is thinking of pitching their global media business, would you add another network to the list when there aren’t that many candidates to put on the list in the first place? I suspect they might.

The challenges ahead

While Havas and Horizon have $20bn in combined billings, a significant portion will remain in those businesses. As mentioned above, the joint venture is aiming for “US-centric global client opportunities,” so is it clientless until the first of those ‘opportunities’ is converted? And even with the clout and influence of the parents’ $20bn, this is still somewhat dwarfed by the billings of WPP, Publicis and the soon-to-be-combined Omnicom-IPG. Then there is the scale challenge of servicing truly global clients. Although Horizon Global can claim a footprint of over 100 countries, the depth and quality of that coverage inevitably varies significantly from market to market. And while a joint venture may be quicker to make happen than a merger, it is not without its own operational complexities and ongoing challenges. It must navigate the inherent tensions of having two parent companies, with different cultures, strategic priorities and ways of working. The leadership team, split between New York and Paris, will need to maintain constant alignment while managing potentially competing interests. Interim CEO Bob Lord and global COO Renata Spackova both still have their existing day jobs to attend to at Horizon and Havas, respectively.

A missed opportunity

As someone who witnessed first-hand the power of an agency name during my time with a business called Naked, I do wonder if a trick has been missed here. Undoubtedly, there are many factors that make the likes of Mischief, Rethink, Uncommon and Special such unique and successful businesses, but I’ll bet that the name and the ethos that sits behind each of them will have often been a distinguishing pitch-winning factor, overtly or subliminally. But Horizon Global… BluConverged… What’s my suggestion, you ask? ‘The Other One.’ Where client relationships are everything and execution is paramount, even the most elegant partnership structures can crumble if they can’t deliver superior outcomes. Without this, the masterstroke soon becomes a mirage. But one thing is certain: the big media agency landscape just became a little more interesting. Read more

The Drum Live Panel Compered by Barry Dudley: Holdco veterans declare ‘a new era for independents’

The Drum Live 2025 is now in full swing, featuring two days of debate and comment that bring their audience into the live workings of The Drum. What do VCCP, FGS Global and Kantar all have in common? Yes, they’re some of the biggest organisations in the marketing world, but there’s something else too: they’re among the companies that have left the world of marketing’s titanic holding companies and are enjoying their time as independents. So says Ajaz Ahmed, who’s been on his own journey of independence of late. The founder of AKQA led the agency through its acquisition by WPP until the point at which he turned a critic of adland’s holding company model. He left in 2024 and this year has launched Studio.One, which he told The Drum will be a “direct rival” to the “slow, bloated, expensive agency model” at the holdcos. Speaking at The Drum Live today, Ahmed celebrated a “new era for independent agencies,” in which, he says, not only are those former WPP-owned shops such as VCCP thriving, but other indies, including Mother and Mischief, are entering a purple patch. “They’re all thriving,” Ahmed told an audience at The Drum’s HQ in Shoreditch, London. “And the founders or the partners have both the skin in the game and that stakeholder management. It’s definitely an exciting time for independent agencies.” Ahmed was joined on stage by Jon Goulding, the chief executive at independent shop Atomic London since 2012, who racked up 12 years at Omnicom shops Rapp and DDB; and Zoe Eagle, chief exec at Iris (an indie-adjacent shop owned by Cheil), a veteran of Publicis’s BBH and an ad behemoth of another kind, Accenture, as it absorbed Karmarama. The panel was compered by Barry Dudley – no stranger to indie-network dynamics in his role as a partner at M&A advisory practice Green Square. Why are independents finding themselves so bullish? Well, the ad biz isn’t a zero-sum game, but one factor is a battery of high-profile manoeuvrings in the holdco world that our panellists used to call home, which bespeak opportunity for hungry indies: the ongoing Omnicom-IPG merger; WPP welcoming a new leader amid a difficult year; Dentsu reportedly looking to offload its holdings outside Japan; S4 posting shrinking revenues.

Lessons from the mothership

While it’s convenient to treat the ad industry’s holding companies as an interchangeable set, of course, that’s only a convenient fiction: they’re distinct organisations with distinct histories and organisational set-ups. “Not all holding companies are the same and to kind of have this umbrella term as a holding company and imagine they’re all running the same way is completely and utterly inaccurate,” says Ahmed. Still, each of our panellists has entered their current role with lessons of what to bring forward from their former employers and what to leave well behind. Ahmed’s Studio.One, for example, has done away with time sheets and is committed to not having an HR department. Another lesson from former employer WPP, he says, is: “There seem to be more job titles than there are people [at the holding companies]. So many chiefs! Everyone at holding companies seems to be a ‘chief’… What we vowed was that we’re going to have only three job titles.” For her part, Zoe Eagle’s first act when arriving at Iris almost a year ago was getting rid of ‘utilization’ as a metric. “I found it to be a shrink-inducing thing to be focusing on,” Eagle says. “It’s sort of pointless to be looking at when you’re trying to create an environment that is innovation-focused, growth-oriented and about top-line growth.” It’s not just a practical consideration for Eagle – in fact, this issue connects to an existential question for the marketing industry: “Are we compliance-governance-process organizations, or are we innovation-organizations that are going to encourage unexpected, entrepreneurial, out-of-the-box thinking? That’s where disproportionate, explosive growth is going to come from. And tech transformation is really putting that into focus: when you’re trying to drive efficiency within a tech stack, you need a completely different type of person than when you’re trying to create something totally unexpected and never seen before that’s going to cut through.”

From ‘holding company’ to ‘operating company’

Running Atomic now for over 13 years, Jon Goulding says that it all comes down to using the agility of independence to give clients what they want. And what they want is to really get to know their partners and feel the impact of collaboration with them. “Clients need those collisions of really seeing people working on their business and their company’s future,” he says. Being an operator and not just a manager is the route to that collaborative mode. Holdcos and indies alike, Goulding says, need to get closer to operations. “The problem with the name ‘holding company’ is that, by definition, it was built to hold entrepreneurial people… Now, you’ve got to move to being an ‘operating company.’” What does this prototypical ‘operating company’ look like? For Goulding, it comes down to avoiding the pitfalls of moving further away from the work. “There are a lot of CEOs who aren’t actually in control of their businesses or all their clients’ work. That’s why it’s such a rich time for indies, because you’re able to throw yourself into online client work. The opportunity is to get off the fence and become an operating company”. For Eagle, this all smells like opportunity. Both holding companies and independents will continue to exist for as long as any of us can see, but which ones will survive, she says, will come down to agility and entrepreneurialism. “You need environments that can nurture innovative, creative thinking. And I think the question will be, which of these businesses is able to do that effectively? The market demand isn’t going anywhere. “Businesses want to hack growth because resources are tight. You need people who are equipped to be entrepreneurial… There’s an opportunity for businesses like ours to get that talent out and really give them the space to thrive.” Read more  

The Omnicom / IPG shakedown – Panel Debate Lead by Barry Dudley at The Drum Live, 24th September 2025

There’s lots happening in the global advertising holding companies as Omnicom and IPG prepare to merge and rumours persist that other major groups are planning on joining forces to face a marketing future destined to be governed by AI, data and automation. So, what does this all mean if you are a brand using one of the agencies owned by IPG, Omnicom, Stagwell, Publicis, WPP, Havas and Dentsu? Barry Dudley will moderate a panel where participants share their views on what the future holds for the holdco model and what the agency your brand is using in the coming years will look like.   Read more Attend Agenda