While Reeves’s Halloween budget wasn’t as bad as expected, it’s not good news for agencies. Tony Walford writes in The Drum

The UK has been waiting 14 years for a Labour budget and, as expected, a rise in employers’ national insurance has stolen many of the headlines, but there was much more. Green Square’s Tony Walford asks if agency leaders are in for a bumpy ride in 2025 as a result. This afternoon, a client compared the budget to one of those fairground ghost trains where you’re promised an absolute bedlam of horrors but, once it starts rattling along the track, it’s all a bit lame. I have to say she was bang on the money, but there were still some nasty twists. The first thing that’s quite irritating is that in scaring folks by largely keeping schtum on what would happen regarding capital gains tax (CGT) and inheritance tax (IHT), while promising no rises in income tax, corporation tax and VAT, Rachel Reeves led a lot of business owners and individuals to take major life decisions in the short term based on conjecture. Last month, in a piece in The Drum, I countenanced against agency owners and shareholders taking a discount to close a sale pre-budget in case the hit to CGT wasn’t as bad as expected. It had been mooted that it could be aligned to income tax, so worst case 45%, but today’s hike from 20% to 24% for higher and top-rate taxpayers is right at the bottom end of expectations. Business asset disposal relief (formerly entrepreneurs relief), which gives qualifying business shareholders a reduced tax rate of 10% on the first £1m of gains, is being held until April 5, 2025, when it will rise to 14% and 18% in 2026. Those that sold quickly and at a chunky discount may rue the day, but I don’t write this with a smug ‘I told you so.’ The government fueling expectations of a Halloween horror-show budget with many being plunged into the depths of hellfire, when in reality it’s a few burnt marshmallows around the fan heater, is a very poor show. The lack of transparency was pitiful and the cynic in me would think it was done on purpose to drive the tax grab up between July’s election result and today’s budget through fear, with the huge time period between the two cementing this conspiracy theory further. The good news is we now know what the rates are and, as it’s not that bad, we don’t foresee a big impact on agency M&A or ongoing investment. Indeed, those qualifying shareholders in a sale process will still save £40,000 in CGT if they get it closed by April. Those in private equity firms that invest in the companies they fund personally will see a relatively modest rise of 4% in their CGT rates. – again, not ridiculously penal, and I’d like to think it won’t impact investment. The real kicker for all businesses however, and particularly smaller ones already struggling with staff costs, is the increase in employers’ NI and the reduction in the threshold from next April. Businesses currently pay employers’ national insurance of 13.8% on every employee’s salary once their salary exceeds £9,100. This is a direct cost of employment and the increase in employers’ NI to 15% (and threshold reduction to £5,000) will have a direct impact of at least 1.2% on the total salary bill of virtually all businesses that employ staff. There is some light for businesses that have four or fewer employees on the national minimum wage who will get an additional £5,000 relief, but this is unlikely to be of any comfort to the vast majority reading this piece. Staff costs are an agency’s biggest single expense line, with a key ratio being staff cost to revenue and the golden target being somewhere between 55% and 60%. Many agencies have been struggling to even get down to a ratio of 60% in recent times, particularly as salaries have gone up with the cost of living while clients have pushed back on fee increases. This additional levy is very unwelcome and if firms can’t pass the cost on to their clients, they will need to find savings in the form of reducing discretionary spend. This could include agencies revisiting their own marketing strategy, holding recruitment, cutting various internal budgets and, in the worst case, reducing headcount. On a macro view, clients will also be suffering the NI increases and the broader impact of higher staff costs and resulting lower profitability could lead to reductions in marketing budgets. These are often the first to be cut in tough times and last to be reinstated when things improve and will be a double-edged sword for all of us in the marketing industry. There were other changes, of course, but the employers’ NI twist in the ghost train track is the one with the biggest capability of spilling a lot of folk from the carriages. Let’s see how the upcoming impact pans out as we head towards the next tax year. Read more

As budgets stagnate, Omnicom, Publicis, IPG, Havas and WPP deliver mixed results in Q3. Barry Dudley writes in The Drum

With Halloween just around the corner and the IPA’s latest Bellwether talking of ‘stagnating’ marketing budgets in the UK, a fearless Barry Dudley of Green Square looks at Omnicom, Publicis, Havas, IPG and WPP’s Q3 results to see what horrors lie within. Both Omnicom and Publicis released their Q3 results last week and, despite some pretty mad things going on in the world right now, I’d say they are pretty good. Omnicom reported organic growth of 6.5% with revenues of $3.9bn, up from $3.6bn in Q3 of 2023. Key to this were a 9.4% increase for Advertising & Media and a very impressive 35.3% jump in Experiential. The Healthcare and Branding & Retail Commerce disciplines struggled, however, with 1.1% and 5.4% declines respectively. The latter is surprising as retail has been a hot area of late, with agencies such as Next15’s SMG roaring ahead. All geographies saw growth of between 6.5% (US) and 24.8% (Middle East & Africa), except for Other North America at 1.5% and a decline of 0.2% in the UK. This UK performance probably reflects the recent findings by the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising that said that many companies were ‘pressing pause’ on their marketing budgets ahead of the government’s budget next week. Publicis also delivered a strong performance in Q3, with organic growth of 5.8% to €3.4bn, up from €3.2bn in Q3 of 2023. Chairman and CEO Arthur Sadoun said: “Once again, we were able to gain market share by capturing a disproportionate amount of client demand for personalization at scale, with our combined media and Epsilon activities growing at almost 10%. All of our regions delivered strongly, with the US at +4%, Europe at +4.9% and APAC at +6.4%, with China accelerating to +12.4%”. Despite the “increasingly challenging macroeconomic environment,” Sadoun is maintaining his typical bullishness by upgrading the full-year organic growth guidance to at least 5.5%, up from 5%. Publicis was also on the front foot with its M&A activity, spending a tidy $1bn during the quarter on acquiring Influential, an influencer marketing platform, and Mars United Commerce, a commerce marketing company. Interpublic Group (IPG) released its results this week, with organic revenue ‘unchanged’ at $2.63bn from Q3 2023 ($2.68bn) – so quite some way behind Omnicom and Publicis. And the outlook for the full year also remains largely unchanged, with CEO Philippe Krakowsky commenting: “Looking forward, we are seeing a strong new business pipeline, for both Q4 activity and longer-term AOR opportunities, and we remain focused on achieving organic growth of approximately 1% this year.” Although this 1% is at the lower end of the 1% to 2% in previous guidance. In terms of regional performance, IPG’s strongest market was Latin America, with 9.8% organic net revenue growth. But its biggest market, the US, saw no growth, while Continental Europe was up 0.6%, UK down 0.7%, Asia Pacific down a lumpy 7.4% and All Other Markets were up 1.5%. That seems like there are quite a few headwinds in quite a few places – I’d hazard a guess that the upcoming US election is a factor for that geography. In times gone by, it could have been the likes of R/GA and Huge to bring bright news for IPG, but both are now ‘held for sale’ with conversations, according to Krakowsky, “a good way down the track.” Next up was Havas, reported within its parent company Vivendi’s results. Yannick Bolloré, chairman of Vivendi’s supervisory board, and Arnaud de Puyfontaine, CEO of Vivendi, said: “Vivendi has reported strong growth in the first nine months of 2024. The revenues of the Group increased by 4.5% at constant currency and perimeter compared with the same period in 2023. Canal+ experienced revenue growth across all of its activities. The performance delivered by Havas was particularly driven by Havas Media and the Europe and Latin America regions.” They subsequently added: “These performances confirm the strength of our main businesses and their capacity to become independent if the shareholders’ meeting convened on December 9, 2024, approves the group’s proposed split project.” A confident message around Havas and its potential independent stock exchange listing in the future. This seems a little at odds with a 2.3% organic revenue decline in Q2 and a 3.5% decline in Q3 against the corresponding periods in 2023, but a Q3 decline was forecast in Q2 mainly due to a ‘partial loss of a big client in the US.’ The hope in Q2 was for a return to organic growth in Q4 or maybe in 2025. Let’s see! Europe and Latin America had solid organic growth at 2.8% and 12.1%, respectively. Asia-Pacific and Africa declined 0.6% and, much like IPG, North America was a challenge with a 7.5% decline. But there was no slowdown in the Havas M&A team adding Hotglue, an Aussie ‘media agency and creative production company’ and DPMG in the UK, an ‘Adobe top 3 recommended independent agency.’ And then there was WPP. Mark Read, CEO, said: “Our third quarter delivered like-for-like growth in net sales, with a strong performance from GroupM in particular. We saw growth in North America, Western Continental Europe and India, though trading in China remains difficult.” He went on to say: “We are encouraged by progress during the quarter, but with recent new business wins primarily impacting 2025 and continuing macroeconomic pressures, our expectations for the full year remain unchanged.” An interesting point for me was the 7% growth in Q3 for its top 10 clients. Winning new clients is the lifeblood of the agency world, both for the maths as well as the excitement and challenge for the talent, and we regularly tell the businesses we work with that their existing clients should be the number one business development opportunity. More results are still to come and I expect the variety of fortunes to be extended further! Read more